ArticleBiology of sport2026
Morning priming exercises for explosive performance: time course effects of two-way ballistic and strength-based protocols.
Article in Biology of sport, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of Two-Way Ballistic Versus Jump Squat Training on Explosive Strength and Neuromuscular Adaptations in Highly Trained Sprinters.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To examine the effects of low- and high-intensity two-way ballistic (TWB) priming exercise versus high-intensity traditional strength exercise (TSE) on explosive performance at 6 h and 24 h post-intervention. Twenty-eight well-trained male athletes completed four randomized morning sessions (08:00-11:00) in separate weeks: 30% 1RM TWB, 80% 1RM TWB, 80% 1RM TSE, and control. Each priming protocol comprised three sets of six repetitions with 4-min rest intervals. Explosive performance was assessed via countermovement jump (CMJ), five consecutive CMJs, and standing broad jump, measured pre-intervention, and at 6 h and 24 h post. After 6 h, all exercise conditions (excluding control) significantly improved CMJ height (30% 1RM TWB: 6.4 ± 5.0%, d = 1.31; 80% 1RM TWB: 7.4 ± 3.1%, d = 2.49; 80% 1RM TSE: 3.5 ± 4.2%, d = 0.83; all p < 0.01) and relative peak power (3.5 ± 1.8%, d = 1.87; 4.8 ± 1.8%, d = 2.83; 3.2 ± 2.1%, d = 1.53; all p < 0.01). Across conditions, average height across consecutive CMJs increased, with improvements of 6.7 ± 3.5% (d = 1.96), 7.6 ± 6.6% (d = 1.18), and 4.2 ± 2.7% (d = 1.53) for 30% 1RM TWB, 80% 1RM TWB, and 80% 1RM TSE, respectively (all p < 0.01). Similar patterns were observed for reactive strength index-modified (12.4 ± 12.1%, d = 0.95; 9.4 ± 11.7%, d = 0.79; 9.4 ± 14.1%, d = 0.71; all p < 0.01), and standing broad jump distance (1.9 ± 1.2%, d = 1.52; 2.4 ± 1.6%, d = 1.52; 1.1 ± 1.5%, d = 0.72; all p < 0.01). At 24 h, performance gains were largely diminished, with the 30% 1RM TWB condition returning to baseline (all p > 0.05). Both high-intensity protocols (TWB and TSE) maintained improvements, with the TWB protocol yielding the most consistent benefits, particularly in CMJ and CCMJ measures. Morning TWB priming at both low and high intensities enhances explosive performance within 6 h, making it a viable delayed potentiation strategy for sports with afternoon or evening competition. High-intensity TWB sustains benefits up to 24 h, indicating greater suitability for high-intensity or competitive settings requiring prolonged performance readiness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.