ArticleJournal of migration and health2026
Female genital mutilation/cutting burden and perceptions among asylum-seeking women in Berlin, Germany: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of migration and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Germany is a major destination country for asylum-seekers, including from many countries where female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is practiced. Our study aimed to provide empirical data on FGM/C prevalence, associated health complaints and FGM/C-related perceptions among asylum-seeking women in Berlin. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among asylum-seeking women in Berlin, Germany between October 2018 and September 2022. Adult women self-reporting FGM/C were interviewed using a questionnaire querying FGM/C type, physical complaints, and pain domains, and open-ended questions on women's experiences regarding FGM/C. Results: In total, 15,167 women underwent the mandatory medical examination for asylum-seekers during the study period, 1.9% of which self-reported FGM/C. The prevalence reached 18.6% when restricting the population to FGM/C-practicing countries. Women living with FGM/C came predominantly from the African WHO region (61.9%). A total of 151 women consented to being interviewed. The majority (57.0%) self-allocated to FGM/C Type I/II. Menstrual pain was the most reported complaint (77.5%), followed by pain during defecation (29.1%). Most physical complaints were reported by slightly higher proportions among women with FGM/C type III. Women reported a median age of six years at FGM/C execution, which was performed largely by female, non-relatives (64.5%). The majority (90.1%) perceived FGM/C negatively while 7.9% had a neutral or positive attitude towards it due to its cultural significance. Conclusion: FGM/C is prevalent in host countries like Germany with a potentially associated physical and psychosocial health burden. Our findings emphasize the need for a holistic, culturally sensitive response to such health demands by healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.