ArticleEvolution, medicine, and public health2026
Daughters-in-law and mothers-in-law in lowland rural Nepal: The balance of power and health outcomes.
Article in Evolution, medicine, and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: The relationship between daughters-in-law (DIL) and mothers-in-law (MIL) is often portrayed as conflictual, though from an evolutionary perspective, the two women could cooperate to gain Darwinian fitness benefits. We investigated this relationship in a society where it is central to women's social niche. Without asking directly, we aimed to evaluate markers of conflict and harmony in households, and whether variability in this balance was reflected in differential health outcomes. We also tested whether conflict was less likely in households with more children, and hence greater shared genetic interest. Methodology: We studied 110 co-resident DIL-MIL dyads from rural lowland Nepal and compared anthropometry, physical and mental health, lived experience, agency, and attributed contributions to household tasks. Results: Overall, DIL had better mental health than MIL, and greater weight and height. Tension over childcare and resting was common. Mental health and height differences within dyads were greater in households with inferred conflict over childcare, compared to inferred harmony households. DIL had better health outcomes and higher weight and height relative to MIL if they lived in conflict compared to harmony households, whereas MIL had better health outcomes if they lived in harmony households. Number of children did not predict conflict. Conclusions and implications: Despite MIL being senior in the household, DIL reported lower stress and better mental health, especially in households with inferred conflict. DIL in such households also had better nutritional status. Having had time since marriage to consolidate their status in the household, DIL may have increased their agency and power. Lay summary: Our study in rural Nepal aimed to identify which of daughter-in-law or mother-in-law held the upper hand in the household hierarchy, and how this was reflected in health outcomes. Although mothers-in-law are more senior, daughters-in-law had better physical and mental health, especially in households with inferred conflict over childcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.