ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2026
Development and Interpretable Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Chinese COPD Patients: An Analysis of the CHARLS Database.
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi‑feature Prediction Model for Coronary Heart Disease Comorbidity in Middle‑aged and Older Adults with COPD Based on Machine Learning and SHAP.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) experience a significant decline in their quality of life owing to cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study aimed to develop a predictive framework for evaluating CVD risk in patients with COPD. Patients and Methods: Data from 1070 COPD patients participating in the 2015 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) were analyzed. To ensure robust feature selection, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression and the Boruta algorithm were utilized. Subsequently, the predictive performance of six distinct Machine learning (ML) models (Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Gradient Boosting Machine, XGBoost, and Multi-Layer Perceptron) was comprehensively compared. The Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique-Nominal Continuous (SMOTE-NC) was applied to the training set to combat class imbalance. An interpretable risk assessment tool was developed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results: 305 participants (28.50%) had CVD. Seven variables were used to build the six models. The SVM model showed comparatively better performance than the others, with a training Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.819 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.793-0.844), accuracy of 74.42%, sensitivity of 75.56%, precision of 74.18%, specificity of 73.26%, and F1 score of 74.86%. In the test set, the AUROC was 0.719 (95% CI, 0.670-0.760), with an accuracy of 68.63%, sensitivity of 64.20%, precision of 66.53%, specificity of 64.96%, and F1 score of 69.36%. Conclusion: This study identified seven key predictors-sex, body weight, hypertension, dyslipidemia, disability, self-rated health, and vision status-that are significantly associated with cardiovascular risk in Chinese patients with COPD. Among the six machine-learning algorithms evaluated, the SVM model demonstrated the most robust performance; however, its predictive capacity remains moderate, reflecting the inherent limitations of cross-sectional survey data and the reliance on self-reported diagnoses. Future prospective studies and rigorous external validation in independent cohorts are essential to refine these predictors and translate this machine-learning approach into reliable clinical decision-support systems for the personalized management of COPD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.