ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2026
Surgeon Preferences and Outcome Predictions for Displaced Distal Radius Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Survey of 151 Surgeons Making 4,832 Treatment Predictions Based on Patient Profiles and Radiographs.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Vital elderly patients with substantially displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures often undergo surgical treatment, while those with notable comorbidities or less severe fractures are generally treated nonsurgically. As guidelines leave room for interpretation, surgeons must rely on intuition and experience when making treatment decisions. This study explores surgeons' treatment preferences, expectations regarding outcomes, and their ability to predict functional outcomes. Methods: An online survey was conducted among Dutch trauma and orthopedic surgeons. Participants evaluated 16 patient profiles derived from a randomized controlled trial comparing surgery with cast immobilization. Each profile included patient characteristics and radiographs. Surgeons, blinded to the actual treatments and outcomes, indicated their treatment preference and predicted the expected outcomes for both treatment options. Results: A total of 151 surgeons made 4,832 treatment outcome predictions. Participants generally preferred surgical treatment for certain patient profiles and expected more favorable outcomes after surgery than after cast immobilization. However, only 51.5% of outcome predictions corresponding to the actual treatment were correct. No significant differences in predictive accuracy were observed between hand and wrist specialists, other consultants(not specifically hand and wrist specialists), and residents. Conclusions: Orthopedic and trauma surgeons, regardless of subspecialty or experience, demonstrated limited ability to predict functional outcomes for elderly patients with displaced distal radius fractures based on written information and radiographs. With only 51.5% of predictions correct, accuracy did not meaningfully exceed chance. Surgeons generally favored surgical treatment and expected better outcomes than with casting. Type of study/level of evidence: Prognostic V.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.