Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42220418›Full record

ArticleO&G open2026

National Trends in Radical Hysterectomy at Gynecologic Oncology Fellowship Training Programs.

Mitchel Hoffman, Dennis Chi, William Cliby, Karen H Lu, Wenyi Fan, Daniel Clarke-Pearson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in O&G open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mitchel HoffmanDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and USF Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, New York; Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Moffitt Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Moffitt Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Dennis ChiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and USF Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, New York; Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Moffitt Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Moffitt Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
William ClibyDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and USF Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, New York; Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Moffitt Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Moffitt Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Karen H LuDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and USF Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, New York; Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Moffitt Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Moffitt Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Wenyi FanDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and USF Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, New York; Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Moffitt Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Moffitt Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Daniel Clarke-PearsonDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and USF Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, New York; Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Moffitt Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Moffitt Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate trends in radical hysterectomy being performed by gynecologic oncology fellows in the United States.

methodsSummary statistics for Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) programs were obtained from the ACGME public reporting system. For each academic year spanning 2019-2020 through 2024-2025, the national mean procedure count was extracted for radical hysterectomy.

resultsOver the past 5 years, there has been a significant decline in the number of radical hysterectomies being performed by fellows in the United States.

conclusionGynecologic oncology training number in radical hysterectomy has declined. This decline has implications that extend to training in other radical pelvic operations, including lymphadenectomy, cytoreductive surgery, and exenteration.

Identifiers

PMID42220418
PMCPMC13221115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.