ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Online exams buffer the anxiety-procrastination-achievement pathway for distance learners with disabilities.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Tripartite Structure of Preparation Anxiety: Development and Validation of the Preparation Anxiety Scale.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Associations between test anxiety and academic achievement in distance education: avoidance- and overcontrol-related process and the moderating role of exam format preference.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: While Open and Distance Learning (ODL) expands access, the extent to which assessment modality is associated with psychological barriers for learners with disabilities remains underexplored. Aligned with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG 4)-ensuring inclusive and equitable quality education for all-this study contributes evidence on whether assessment design in open and distance systems supports or hinders equitable participation by learners with disabilities. Situated in debates on inclusive and equitable higher education, this study tests a self-regulation account in which test anxiety (TA) predicts academic procrastination (AP), which in turn predicts Grade Point Average (GPA), and examines whether exam environment (EE) moderates these psychological pathways differently for students with and without formally recognized disabilities. Methods: Data were collected via an online questionnaire from 667 undergraduates (118 learners with formally recognized disabilities) in a large-scale distance education system; GPA was obtained from institutional records. Structural equation modelling (SEM) and conditional process (moderated mediation) analyses were employed to test the hypothesized model. Results: AP mediates the negative association between TA and GPA for both disabled and non-disabled learners. For learners with disabilities, EE moderated the procrastination-GPA association: the negative association was stronger in face-to-face settings and weaker in online settings. Discussion: Given the cross-sectional design and self-selection into exam mode, these findings should be interpreted as associations rather than causal effects. Nonetheless, they suggest that carefully designed online assessment may function as an EE that helps reduce environmental frictions that can exacerbate the anxiety-procrastination cycle for some disabled learners, with implications for assessment practice (as a contextual factor) and accessibility and fairness (as contextual concerns) in open and distance higher education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.