ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Concurrent changes in psychological distress and pain thresholds following brief mindfulness: an exploratory phenotyping study of chronic pain.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinical trials of brief mindfulness interventions (BMIs) for chronic pain frequently report small average effect sizes, which may mask substantial heterogeneity in treatment responses. Rather than testing general efficacy, this exploratory study investigated whether a BMI is associated with concurrently coupled psychological and sensory improvements within individuals, potentially reflecting top-down nociceptive modulation. Methods: Fifty female outpatients with chronic pain completed a 2-week BMI. Psychological distress [pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) and hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS)] and objective sensory markers of central sensitization [pressure pain threshold (PPT)] were assessed pre- and post-intervention. To explore treatment response heterogeneity, multivariate analyses-including principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis-were conducted using individual change scores. Results: At the group level, the BMI did not produce statistically significant pre-post changes. However, exploratory multivariate analyses revealed strong intra-individual coupling of responses. PCA extracted a single dimension, "simultaneous psychological and sensory improvement," suggesting that reductions in catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression co-varied concurrently with increases in PPT. Furthermore, cluster analysis identified a highly responsive subgroup ("high psychological improvement") that exhibited significant concurrent increases in PPT, potentially representing a distinct clinical phenotype. Conclusion: The true impact of BMIs in chronic pain may lie not in uniform group-level efficacy, but in the concurrent coupling of psychological and sensory improvements within specific individuals. These findings challenge "one-size-fits-all" approaches, highlighting the critical need for mechanism-based patient stratification to advance precision pain care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.