ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Psychological factors demonstrate the largest incremental predictive value in a multi-domain machine learning model for secondary injury risk after ACL reconstruction.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Secondary injury after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, defined as ipsilateral graft rerupture or contralateral ACL rupture, remains a clinical challenge. Current prediction models predominantly fail to capture this multifactorial risk. In this study, we developed a multi-domain machine learning model to predict the risk of secondary injury. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 487 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction. Thirty predictor variables spanning demographic, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), gait analysis, isokinetic strength, and psychological domains were collected at a standardized 6-month postoperative follow-up. Five machine learning algorithms were evaluated using a nested cross-validation scheme, with SHAP analysis and domain ablation applied for interpretability. Results: Sixty-four patients (13.1%) sustained secondary injuries (ipsilateral graft re-rupture or contralateral ACL rupture). Logistic regression achieved the best discriminative performance (AUC = 0.739, 95% CI: 0.672-0.806) and calibration (Brier score = 0.106), although no statistically significant difference was observed between logistic regression and random forest (corrected paired Conclusion: A multi-domain machine learning model identified patients at elevated secondary injury risk with acceptable discrimination and calibration. Kinesiophobia and depressive symptoms showed the largest incremental predictive contributions among the domains examined, suggesting that systematic psychological screening within postoperative rehabilitation warrants further investigation in prospective and externally validated studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.