ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Identifying factors and predicting mental health issues in polypharmacy elderly using machine learning: a study based on the English longitudinal study of aging.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Polypharmacy is common among the elderly and is associated with various health issues. Identifying risk factors and developing accurate predictive models for mental health issues in polypharmacy elderly individuals is crucial for early intervention. Methods: Data from the English Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSA) were used, covering waves 1-9. The study identified factors associated with mental health issues through clinical baseline analysis and univariate logistic regression. Twelve machine learning models were constructed and validated using the mlr3 framework, with KNN emerging as the optimal model based on AUC, DCA, and calibration curves. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was used to interpret the KNN model. Results: Baseline analysis and logistic regression identified antidepressant use, age, pain frequency, smoking history, and respiratory improvement medication use as significant factors. The KNN model demonstrated superior performance with an AUC of 0.901 in the training set and 0.827 in the validation set, showing high discrimination ability and robustness. Conclusion: This study identified key factors associated with mental health issues in polypharmacy elderly and validated the KNN model as an effective predictive tool. These findings can inform targeted interventions and improve mental health outcomes in this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.