Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42220356›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Development and validation of the doctoral students' time anxiety scale.

Jianyue Chen, Jiajia Ren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jianyue ChenAcademy of Civil Aviation Transportation, Chengdu Aeronautic Polytechnic University, Chengdu, China.
Jiajia RenXuZhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Doctoral students represent a critical population for cultivating innovative talent, and their mental health directly impacts higher education quality and technological innovation capacity. However, the time anxiety commonly experienced by doctoral students in academic settings lacks systematic investigation, and no specialized time anxiety scale exists for this population. This study employed a sequential qualitative-quantitative mixed-methods approach, utilizing grounded theory to explore the structural dimensions of doctoral students' time anxiety and empirical methods to develop a measurement scale. The results revealed that doctoral students' time anxiety comprises three interconnected dimensions: affective anxiety, cognitive anxiety, and behavioral manifestations. These dimensions mutually influence one another, collectively shaping doctoral students' temporal experiences and affecting their academic performance. The final 12-item Doctoral Students' Time Anxiety Scale demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity, making it suitable for measuring time anxiety and conducting empirical research among doctoral students. This scale provides a scientifically sound and effective tool for doctoral students' mental health assessment, intervention design, and higher education management.

Indexed as

doctoral studentsgraduate educationgrounded theoryscale developmenttime anxiety

Identifiers

PMID42220356
PMCPMC13216462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.