Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42220345›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Mechanisms of semantic composition in older adults: control, semantic processing, and imagery.

Heather Bruett, Xiaoxi Qi, Marc N Coutanche

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Heather BruettDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Xiaoxi QiDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Marc N CoutancheDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Semantic composition is the ability to create meaningful novel concepts from familiar concepts. This can be achieved through a set of cognitive abilities that vary across individuals. As aging affects semantic networks in complex ways, examining how older adults experience the process of combining concepts can clarify which cognitive abilities contribute to maintaining flexible conceptual thinking. Methods: In this study, 87 healthy older adults and a comparison group of 83 younger adults completed a semantic composition task, along with tasks measuring individual variation in cognitive processes hypothesized to underlie semantic composition: semantic processing, cognitive control, divergent and convergent creative thinking, and visual imagery. Results: In older adults, ease of semantic composition (in the form of conceptual combination) was predicted by cognitive control abilities, particularly when combining ambiguous word pairs that require resolving competing interpretations. In addition, older adults with stronger semantic processing and more vivid visual imagery found conceptual combination easier, with visual imagery especially benefiting attributive combinations. In younger adults, by contrast, ease of combining was more selectively related to cognitive control, with less evidence that semantic processing or imagery contributed in the same way. Discussion: These findings demonstrate that the experienced ease of semantic composition in older adults reflects contributions from multiple cognitive mechanisms, varying by combination type, to maintain the capacity for conceptual flexibility.

Indexed as

agingconceptual combinationindividual differencessemantic compositionsemantic memory

Identifiers

PMID42220345
PMCPMC13216000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.