Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42220340›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2026

RxMap: an LLM-assisted tool for medication normalization.

Eero Korpela, Leah H Rubin, Raha M Dastgheyb, Yanxun Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eero KorpelaDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Leah H RubinDepartments of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Raha M DastgheybDepartments of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Yanxun XuDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5554-8637

Funding

Bayesian Methods for Optimizing Combination Antiretroviral Therapy for Mentalhealth in People with HIVR01MH128085 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Yanxun Xu · 2022 to 2026
$2.0M
SCH: New Bayesian Causal Structural Discovery and Reinforcement Learning Methods for Mental health in HIV CareR01AI197147 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Yang Ni, Leah Helane Rubin · 2025 to 2026
$558k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI197147NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH128085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To develop a freely available, researcher-oriented system for accurate normalization of free-text medication strings to standardized RxNorm ingredient-level concepts. Methods: RxMap implements a fully automated normalization pipeline that combines deterministic RxNorm candidate generation with large language model (LLM)-assisted lexical parsing and hierarchical ingredient-level reconciliation. Raw medication strings are normalized to RxNorm ingredient-level (IN/MIN) concepts. ATC codes are assigned post-normalization, and an optional review interface supports transparent human review. Results: Evaluation on 22 624 unique medication strings from the IPUMS MEPS dataset demonstrated substantial improvements over deterministic RxNorm matching alone. The best-performing RxMap configuration improved RxCUI-level precision, recall, and F1-score from 0.865, 0.853, and 0.859 to 0.969, 0.964, and 0.966, respectively, with similar gains at the ingredient level. Conclusion: RxMap provides accurate, scalable normalization of free-text medication data to RxNorm concepts. The system operates fully automatically, offers optional review for quality control, and enables reproducible batch processing for research workflows.

Indexed as

data harmonizationlarge language modelsmedical concept normalizationRxNorm

Identifiers

PMID42220340
PMCPMC13221971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.