ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2026
Diagnostic performance of ultrasound in identifying early knee osteoarthritis features in a 33-year-old birth cohort.
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of Ultrasonographic, Radiographic, Computed Tomographic, and Ex Vivo Measurements of Feline Femoral Trochlear Groove Depth.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in detecting early patellofemoral and tibiofemoral joint osteoarthritis changes in a young population using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the reference. Method: This cross-sectional study included 288 participants (aged 33 years) from the Northern Finland 1986 Birth Cohort. All underwent unilateral knee imaging with ultrasound, MRI, and conventional radiography. Osteophytes, joint space narrowing, and cartilage lesions were evaluated using standardized methods. Diagnostic performance was compared against MRI using contingency tables and McNemar's test. Results: Radiographic osteoarthritis prevalence was low in the study population. For cartilage lesions, ultrasound showed low sensitivity (0.33-0.41) but high specificity (0.86-0.90), achieving high overall accuracy (0.85-0.87). For osteophytes, ultrasound significantly outperformed radiography in the femoral tibiofemoral joint (sensitivity 0.68-0.83 vs. 0.03-0.28). Both modalities struggled with trochlear osteophytes. Conclusion: In a young population, ultrasound is a promising tool for tibiofemoral osteophyte detection. Although ultrasound's low sensitivity limits its ability to rule out cartilage pathology, its high specificity indicates that detected lesions likely represent true pathology. Patellofemoral joint assessment is challenging. Our findings support ultrasound as a complementary method alongside radiography in early osteoarthritis detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.