ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2026
Asymmetric niche partitioning in large omnivores in response to anthropogenic disturbances within subarctic ecosystems.
Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Asymmetric niche partitioning in large omnivores in response to anthropogenic disturbances within subarctic ecosystems.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Niche partitioning is an evolutionary process that allows the coexistence of multiple species in a landscape. However, human disturbance can interfere with this process. For instance, humans may displace competitors and favour species with a greater tolerance for disturbances. American black bears (Ursus americanus) and grizzly bears (U. arctos) are two large omnivores that share similar ecological niches, but that can also coexist by partitioning resources. Understanding the consequences of anthropogenic disturbance on niche partitioning in these two species is important to preserve biodiversity and ecosystem function. This importance is particularly relevant in landscapes located in subarctic biomes where resource availability is limited. In this study, we used data from wildlife cameras deployed at 194 sites in central Yukon during 2020-2023 to determine whether anthropogenic disturbances facilitated, or disrupted, spatiotemporal niche partitioning in American black bears and grizzly bears. Kernel density functions revealed that grizzly bears modified their diel activity pattern in the higher-disturbance landscape during the afternoon, presumably to avoid interactions with humans. This new peak coincidentally promoted temporal niche partitioning with black bears, whose activity pattern remained static across the gradient of disturbance. The bear species spatially segregate, but anthropogenic disturbances had a much stronger effect on grizzly bear occurrences compared to black bears, signalling an asymmetric response. Anthropogenic disturbances constrained grizzly bears to the lower-disturbance landscape. Black bears could take advantage of reduced competition and partially fill the spatiotemporal niche of grizzly bears, but our results did not show that black bears concentrated their activity in areas avoided by grizzly bears. The displacement of grizzly bears may lead to shifts in prey populations or vegetation communities, with unknown consequences for ecosystem structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.