Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42220301›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2026

Asymmetric niche partitioning in large omnivores in response to anthropogenic disturbances within subarctic ecosystems.

Ludovick Brown, Chrystal Mantyka-Pringle, Joël Potié, Pascale Savage, Megan Hornseth, Jason T Fisher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ludovick BrownSchool of Environmental Studies, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3647-5879
Chrystal Mantyka-PringleWildlife Conservation Society Canada, Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada.
Joël PotiéFish and Wildlife Branch, Department of Environment, Government of Yukon, Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada.
Pascale SavageFish and Wildlife Branch, Department of Environment, Government of Yukon, Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada.
Megan HornsethFish and Wildlife Branch, Department of Environment, Government of Yukon, Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada.
Jason T FisherSchool of Environmental Studies, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9020-6509

Funding

Earth RangersEnvironment and Climate Change Canada GCXE21C168Government of YukonWeston Family FoundationWildlife Conservation Society CanadaYESAB Implementation Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Niche partitioning is an evolutionary process that allows the coexistence of multiple species in a landscape. However, human disturbance can interfere with this process. For instance, humans may displace competitors and favour species with a greater tolerance for disturbances. American black bears (Ursus americanus) and grizzly bears (U. arctos) are two large omnivores that share similar ecological niches, but that can also coexist by partitioning resources. Understanding the consequences of anthropogenic disturbance on niche partitioning in these two species is important to preserve biodiversity and ecosystem function. This importance is particularly relevant in landscapes located in subarctic biomes where resource availability is limited. In this study, we used data from wildlife cameras deployed at 194 sites in central Yukon during 2020-2023 to determine whether anthropogenic disturbances facilitated, or disrupted, spatiotemporal niche partitioning in American black bears and grizzly bears. Kernel density functions revealed that grizzly bears modified their diel activity pattern in the higher-disturbance landscape during the afternoon, presumably to avoid interactions with humans. This new peak coincidentally promoted temporal niche partitioning with black bears, whose activity pattern remained static across the gradient of disturbance. The bear species spatially segregate, but anthropogenic disturbances had a much stronger effect on grizzly bear occurrences compared to black bears, signalling an asymmetric response. Anthropogenic disturbances constrained grizzly bears to the lower-disturbance landscape. Black bears could take advantage of reduced competition and partially fill the spatiotemporal niche of grizzly bears, but our results did not show that black bears concentrated their activity in areas avoided by grizzly bears. The displacement of grizzly bears may lead to shifts in prey populations or vegetation communities, with unknown consequences for ecosystem structure.

Indexed as

Anthropogenic EffectsEcosystemUrsidaeAnimalsWyomingactivity patterncoexistencecompetitionecological nichefacilitationUrsus americanusUrsus arctosYukon

Identifiers

PMID42220301
PMCPMC13322178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.