ReviewThe Journal of animal ecology2026
Deep blueprint: A literature review and guide to automated image classification for ecologists.
Review in The Journal of animal ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep blueprint: A literature review and guide to automated image classification for ecologists.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026Review
- Biodiversity of the abyssal and hadal zone in the Nova Canton Trough (Central Pacific Ocean; 2751-7989 m): a visual inventory.Biodiversity data journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) is a powerful tool to extract ecological information from large image datasets efficiently and consistently. However, applying these methods remains challenging, due in part to the complexity of DL workflows and the dynamic nature of available tools. To address this, we created a practical guide and review, focused on one of the fundamental tasks in automated image analysis: image classification. Our approach integrates commonly used software and highlights key steps-from image acquisition to annotated, model-ready datasets, to training, evaluation and deployment. It is modular and supported by a flexible code base (in Python, with R alternatives where possible) and Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs), enabling adaptation to different models and ecological objectives. The goal is to empower ecologists to confidently incorporate computer vision into their research. We illustrate this approach, using an open-source ROV dataset from the Norwegian Sea, featuring deep-sea biotopes defined by multivariate clusters of depth, substrate type, and associated species. To balance accessibility for users alongside performance, we focused on CNN models from the Ultralytics ML Platform (YOLO V.8 and V.11), comparing the full suite of architectures that range in complexity and efficiency. Cross-validation revealed high overall performances and that larger, more complex models are not always superior, with YOLO V.8m best (accuracy and macro-averaged performance metrics = ~0.97-0.98). Notably, high performances were achieved despite labels being based on both visual and external environmental predictors, suggesting visual features alone were sufficient for classification in this dataset. We highlight that the decision to deploy a model must be made in light of the study's objectives, with domain-based reasoning and experience guiding every stage of implementation. This work offers a practical blueprint for implementing DL in ecological research, promoting broader adoption and supporting reproducibility and more efficient, standardised, and sustainable monitoring; in this case of deep-sea biotopes, which is essential for marine spatial planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.