Observational studyStroke2026
Impact of Cerebral Small Vessel Disease on Functional Decline: Bleeding With Antithrombotic Therapy 2 Study.
Observational study in Stroke, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo what extent cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) contributes to functional disability remains unclear. We investigated the longitudinal effect of SVD burden on functional decline.
methodsIn this investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter, and observational study, patients receiving oral antithrombotic therapy for cerebrovascular or cardiovascular diseases were enrolled from 52 hospitals across Japan (2016-2019) and followed for 24 months. SVD score (range, 0-4) was calculated on baseline magnetic resonance imaging obtained under prespecified conditions. The outcomes were an increase in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score from baseline to end of follow-up (ΔmRS score ≥1). Logistic regression evaluated the association between ΔmRS score ≥1 and SVD score, adjusting for age, sex, premorbid mRS, vascular risk factors, antithrombotic therapy, magnetic resonance imaging field strength, and bleeding or ischemic events during follow-up. Bleeding and ischemic events were treated as time-dependent covariates. Causal mediation analyses using a 4-way decomposition separated the effects of SVD score ≥3 on ΔmRS score ≥1 into direct and indirect effects (mediated by major bleeding or ischemic events).
resultsOf 5378 patients enrolled, 613 were excluded mainly due to the lack of clinical or imaging data. Finally, 4765 patients were analyzed (1573 women; median age, 73 years); ΔmRS score ≥1 was observed in 13.2% of patients with SVD score 0, 16.1% with 1, 20.7% with 2, 28.1% with 3, and 28.2% with 4. SVD score of 3 (adjusted odds ratio, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.27-2.15]) and SVD score of 4 (1.62 [95% CI, 1.19-2.19]) were associated with ΔmRS score ≥1 compared with SVD score of 0. Causal mediation analysis indicated that 73.05% of the total effect of SVD score ≥3 on ΔmRS score ≥1 was attributed to the controlled direct effect (coefficient, 0.497 [95% CI, 0.26-0.73]).
conclusionsSVD burden was associated with functional decline beyond significant bleeding or ischemic events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.