Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42220113›Full record

ReviewEssays in biochemistry2026

Imaging of biofilms using cryo-scanning electron microscopy.

Saskia E Bakker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Essays in biochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Saskia E BakkerAdvanced Bioimaging RTP, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-3958-4421

Funding

UKRI | Medical Research Council (MRC) MR/Y002946/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilms are challenging samples for microscopy, because they are usually large samples with small features of interest, a fragile nature due to their high water content, and they may be grown on a variety of substrates. Cryo-scanning electron microscopy (cryo-SEM) has long been used to image microbiological components in plant-pathogen interactions, food products, and soil. The main advantage, compared with the more widely available room temperature SEM, is that the rapid sample preparation results in a native-like structure. It has been used to study environmental biofilms, but rarely for medically relevant biofilms. The cryo-SEM workflow starts with freezing the sample, either by high-pressure freezing, plunge-freezing, or slush nitrogen freezing. This is followed by fracture, sublimation, and coating, before the cryo-SEM imaging takes place. The present review aims to give new potential users an overview of the workflow and give examples of the equipment available, while discussing advantages and limitations of specific steps and their suitability for the research of various biofilms.

Indexed as

BiofilmsCryoelectron MicroscopyMicroscopy, Electron, Scanningbiofilmcryo-scanning electron microscopyelectron microscopyexperimental designworkflow

Identifiers

PMID42220113
PMCPMC13538132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.