ArticleTurkish journal of ophthalmology2026
Modification of the Temporal Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap in Macular Hole Surgery: Envelope Technique
Article in Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case report aims to present a modification of the temporal inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique in macular hole surgery. The inverted ILM flap technique was first described in 2010 and was shown to yield superior functional and anatomical outcomes in large macular holes compared to traditional ILM peeling. However, flap displacement can be a major concern with the inverted ILM flap technique. In the first case, a failed large macular hole after temporal inverted ILM flap surgery was reoperated, and flap displacement was observed as the reason for failure. The displaced ILM flap was inverted again and the superior corner of the flap was tucked under the small ILM defect in the upper nasal macular area to stabilize it. Hence, it is called as “envelope modification”. Another patient with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with coexistent macular hole underwent vitrectomy surgery with silicone oil. The retina was attached postoperatively, and the macular hole was closed with a flat-open pattern. During silicone oil removal, the envelope modification was used and the hole closed. Both patients had visual improvement. Although the inverted ILM flap technique is very effective for large macular holes, the modification described here may further improve the success rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.