ArticleAnnals of work exposures and health2026
Operation-specific and time-resolved monitoring of occupational nano/sub-micron particle exposure in a Swedish metal additive manufacturing facility.
Article in Annals of work exposures and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of the study was to determine nano/sub-micron particle and dust exposure levels throughout the whole workflow at a Swedish metal additive manufacturing (AM) facility, focusing on the laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) method. By evaluating particle levels and composition across different AM processes using both stationary and personal sampling, the study sought to improve exposure assessment and inform protective measures in the metal AM workplaces. Measurements were conducted during five measurement weeks, as five working days Monday-Friday, between October 2020 and October 2023. Personal particle measurements in the breathing zone were performed on Mondays and Fridays for 1 to 3 workers per day. Stationary particle and dust sampling were performed continuously at three locations each week to capture task-specific and temporal variation in emissions. Nano/sub-micron particle concentrations ranged from 0 to 3.3 million particles/cm3, with the highest peaks recorded in the post-processing area. Elevated levels were also detected, near the depowdering machine, by the bandsaw, and in the lunchroom, while levels near the printers were low (<10,000 particles/cm3). Personal exposure peaks occurred during printer cleaning, feedstock powder filling, dust removal with compressed air, post-processing, and packing. In contrast to the increased nano/sub-micron particle levels observed, respirable, and inhalable dust levels were very low. The study highlights the need to monitor particle exposure during both manufacturing and post-processing. Health risks associated with airborne particles are influenced by both exposure levels and the toxicological properties of materials. To ensure a safe and sustainable future for metal AM, comprehensive exposure assessment, risk evaluation, and the implementation of protective measures remain essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.