Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42219875›Full record

ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2026

Considerations for multivariate approaches to classify blow fly species based on cuticular hydrocarbon profiles.

William H Shirley, Alexander J Jutila, Kelly A Waters, Anthony Grigsby, M Eric Benbow, Ruth Waddell Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

William H ShirleyDepartment of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Alexander J JutilaForensic Science Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Kelly A WatersDepartment of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6081-8378
Anthony GrigsbyDepartment of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7690-4256
M Eric BenbowDepartment of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Ruth Waddell SmithDepartment of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.

Funding

Michigan State University Strategic Partnership Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blow flies are early colonizers of human remains, allowing their developmental rates to be used to estimate postmortem interval (PMI). Accurate species identification is essential for PMI estimation, yet traditional methods can be subjective. Recently, the use of cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) for more objective species identification has been demonstrated. These studies generally use multivariate statistical approaches to evaluate differences in CHC profiles among different species. Principal component analysis (PCA) is among the more common procedures used to evaluate these differences. However, PCA often requires data pretreatment steps to address inherent biological differences among specimens, which can result in the loss of meaningful biological trends. Further, few studies have developed the predictive classification models necessary for downstream PMI estimation. In this work, CHCs were extracted from adult females of seven blow fly species and analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Profiles were initially evaluated with PCA and non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS). From PCA, six of the seven species were distinguished, but distinction was influenced heavily by abundance differences due to inherent variability among specimens. From NMDS, tighter species clusters were observed without the need for data pretreatment. Classification models were then developed using partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and random forest modeling. Both models demonstrated high classification success for cross validation (98.67% and 98.67%) and external validation (66.67% and 61.11%), although the random forest classifier had the advantage of requiring no data pretreatment. This work demonstrates successful species classification and highlights considerations for the statistical evaluation of CHC profiles.

Indexed as

CalliphoridaeDipteraHydrocarbonsAnimalsClassification AlgorithmsDiscriminant AnalysisFemaleForensic EntomologyGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryMultidimensional Scaling AnalysisMultivariate AnalysisPrincipal Component AnalysisSpecies SpecificityHydrocarbonsblow fliesCalliphoridaeclassificationcuticular hydrocarbon profilesforensic chemistryforensic entomologygas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC‐MS)multivariate statistical proceduresnon‐metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS)partial least squares‐discriminant analysis (PLS‐DA)principal component analysis (PCA)random forest modeling

Identifiers

PMID42219875
PMCPMC13534879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.