ArticleAnatomical sciences education2026
The impact of family interview on the relationship between medical students and their silent mentor.
Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The gross anatomy laboratory course often triggers significant negative emotions in medical students during dissection. While various pedagogical interventions aim to alleviate psychological burden, the fundamental question of how students' perceptions of donors evolve throughout the course remains underexplored. In our program, students participate in family interviews with donors' family members, which provide a biographical context for the donor. This study investigated the processual nature of medical students' relationship formation with their "silent mentor" and the pivotal role of family interviews in this transformation. A qualitative study was conducted with 12 third-year medical students. Participants were interviewed at two critical time points: before family interviews (T1) and after course completion (T2). Semi-structured interviews explored students' perceptions of the silent mentor's body, the student-donor relationship, and the impact of family interviews. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis to trace the evolution of themes across the semester. Students' experiences unfolded in two distinct phases. Phase 1 was characterized by oscillation between viewing the silent mentor as "person" versus "object," influenced by temporal boundaries and sensory dissonance. Phase 2 revealed the family interview as a transformative catalyst that initiated relationship formation, prompting students to reframe their connection with the silent mentor as teacher, bridge, or companion, while extending reflections to their relationships with living people. The family interview emerges not merely as a humanistic activity but as a critical pedagogical intervention that transforms students' professional identity and compassion through facilitating a profound process of relationship formation with their silent mentor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.