ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2026
Multimodal genomic prediction is not a buzzword: why modern plant breeding must integrate genomics, enviromics, and phenomics.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant breeding has entered a new era, transitioning from a predominantly unimodal, genomics-focused paradigm to one defined by multimodal data integration. Dense genomic markers, long-term environmental datasets, physiological and omics measurements, and high-throughput phenotyping platforms are now routine components of modern breeding programs. Paradoxically, while plant breeding now operates in a multimodal data ecosystem, most prediction models remain effectively unimodal, relying on a single type of information at a time-genomics alone, enviromics alone, physiology alone, or phenomics alone. This overlooks a fundamental biological reality: complex traits emerge from the interaction of genetic potential, environmental conditions, and dynamic physiological responses. Across the life sciences, the integration of heterogeneous biological data has become a central strategy for improving prediction and discovery. We argue that genomic prediction must become truly multimodal to reflect the biological reality that complex traits emerge from interacting genetic, environmental, and physiological processes. We clarify multimodality as distinct from commonly conflated concepts such as multi-environment or multi-trait prediction and outline strategies for integrating heterogeneous data sources using multi-kernel and multi-stream modeling frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.