ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2026
A Biotechnological Approach to Enzyme-Based Fertilisers: Immobilisation of Acid Phosphatases.
Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We explore enzyme-based technologies as sustainable alternatives to conventional chemical fertilisers, addressing the challenges associated with using enzymes in free or immobilised form for agricultural applications. We use the metagenome-derived Class A acid phosphatase M2-32, selected for its high activity, broad pH tolerance and thermophilic properties, and evaluated its immobilisation on clay minerals to enhance stability and applicability in soils. Several clays were tested as immobilisation supports. Bentonite caused complete enzyme inactivation, while kaolin formed aggregates and was unsuitable. In contrast, palygorskite, sepiolite and agrozeolite adsorbed more than 99% of the added enzyme. However, only a fraction of the immobilised enzyme retained catalytic activity, with optimal performance observed at moderate protein loading (40-80 μg protein). Among the tested supports, palygorskite consistently provided the highest specific activity (22,000 ± 2200 U/mg), followed by sepiolite (11,000 ± 730 U/mg), whereas agrozeolite (2250 ± 40 U/mg) showed comparatively low activity. ATR-FTIR spectroscopy confirmed successful enzyme immobilisation without significant alteration of the clay structures. Immobilised M2-32 preserved a broad pH range (between 4 and 8.5) and thermophilic behaviour similar to the free enzyme, remaining active up to 50°C. Immobilisation increased substrate affinity while reducing V
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.