Trial reportPublic health nutrition2026
The feasibility of a dietary and lifestyle behaviour change intervention among low-income Latinas and Indigenous Mexicans in rural desert communities: a pilot randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in Public health nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis article reports on the feasibility, acceptability of a trial design and results of ¡Coma, Muévase y Viva!, an adapted version of the Eat, Move, Live! Curriculum, a 10-week diet and lifestyle change intervention for low-income Latina and Indigenous Mexican women in rural Inland Southern California.
designA pilot randomised intervention and wait-list controlled parallel trial. SETTINGS: Latina and Indigenous Mexican women participated in ¡Coma, Muévase y Viva!, the adapted version of the curriculum customised for Spanish speakers with a focus on health literacy, cultural norms and values, and delivered by community health workers/promotoras.
participantsParticipants were randomised into the intervention (
resultsThe adapted intervention was feasible and acceptable with 87·5 % of participants retained at three months. The intervention was delivered with high fidelity. Intervention compared to control participants reported success with predetermined prioritised goals (OR = 0·25, 95 % CI: 0·06, 0·99,
conclusionThe adapted intervention was feasible and acceptable and indicated an effect on dietary and lifestyle behaviour change with significant changes in meeting desired goals and engaging in healthy eating and physical activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.