ArticleBMC biomedical engineering2026
Bench testing a contact sensing tracheal tube for monitoring the cuff-trachea interface.
Article in BMC biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Phantom system for endotracheal tube cuff seal testing during mechanical ventilation.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cuffed tracheal tubes enable a secure airway during mechanical ventilation; however, improper cuff inflation can lead to complications such as inspiratory gas leaks, pulmonary ingress of orogastric secretions, or tracheal injury. This study explores a sensor-based approach to optimise cuff inflation using fibre Bragg grating (FBG) optical sensors embedded within the cuff to detect contact with the tracheal wall. Testing was conducted on multiple trachea models, including cylindrical and bio-inspired models, as well as ex vivo porcine trachea samples, to assess cuff-trachea contact. Seal performance was evaluated at both standard inflation pressures and contact-guided inflation pressures. The contact-sensing tracheal tube successfully detected cuff-trachea contact in all models and ex vivo samples tested. Seal tests showed that larger diameter tracheal models exhibited lower leakage rates at contact-guided inflation pressures compared with standard inflation, indicating improved sealing. In contrast, smaller diameter models showed higher leakage rates at contact-guided pressures due to cuff folding, which formed leakage pathways. These results demonstrate that contact sensing improved cuff performance in larger tracheal models by enhancing sealing effectiveness. The contact-sensing tracheal tube differentiated tracheal model sizes, indicating potential for personalised cuff inflation to accommodate variations in tracheal size and shape. Future work will focus on further sensor miniaturisation and integration within lower-volume cuffs to enable effective contact sensing across a wider range of tracheal geometries and support translation to in vivo use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.