Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42219497›Full record

Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2026

Electrical impedance tomography-derived flow index during spontaneous breathing trial stratifies the risk of reintubation within 48 h after extubation.

Rui Zhang, Jing Xu, Jingyi Wu, Ruoming Tan, Huaiwu He, Yun Long, Donghuang Hong, Dansen Wu, Hongping Qu, Zhanqi Zhao and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06876792 (Electrical Impedance Tomography-derived Flow Index During Spontaneous Breathing Trial Stratifies the Risk of Reintubation Within 48 h After Extubation), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06876792 completednot on this map

Electrical Impedance Tomography-derived Flow Index During Spontaneous Breathing Trial Stratifies the Risk of Reintubation Within 48 h After Extubation

TypeobservationalSponsorRuijin HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled150ConditionsAcute Respiratory Failure, Ventilator Weaning AssessmentArmselectrical impedance tomography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rui Zhang *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jing Xu *Department of Geriatrics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Jingyi WuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ruoming TanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Huaiwu HeDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yun LongDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Donghuang HongDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Fujian Provincial Center for Critical Care Medicine, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Dansen WuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Fujian Provincial Center for Critical Care Medicine, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Hongping QuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. qhp10516@rjh.com.cn.
Zhanqi ZhaoSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China. zhanqizhao@gzhmu.edu.cn.
Jialin LiuDepartment of Geriatrics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China. liujialin@shsmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Shanghai Municipal Health Commission 20224Y0029Shanghai Natural Science Foundation Project 23ZR143980
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpontaneous breathing trial (SBT) is the standard test of readiness for liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation, but some patients who successfully complete SBT still experience early post-extubation failure. Inspiratory effort during SBT has emerged as an important physiological determinant of weaning tolerance and extubation outcome because it reflects the balance between ventilatory load and respiratory muscle capacity, yet its assessment often requires airway occlusions, dedicated ventilator algorithms, or intermittent measurements. We therefore evaluated whether an electrical impedance tomography (EIT)-derived flow index (EFI) measured during SBT was associated with SBT outcome and with reintubation within 48 h after extubation.

methodsIn this prospective multicenter observational study, mechanically ventilated adults receiving invasive ventilation for at least 48 h underwent a standardized 30-min pressure support SBT with continuous EIT monitoring. EFI was calculated breath by breath from EIT-derived inspiratory flow-time profiles. The primary endpoint was SBT outcome. A prespecified key secondary endpoint was reintubation within 48 h after planned extubation among patients who successfully completed the SBT and underwent extubation according to routine care. EFI discrimination for SBT failure was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis. For the post-extubation analysis, 48-h freedom from reintubation was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models.

resultsA total of 150 patients were enrolled, of whom 107 successfully completed the SBT and underwent planned extubation. EFI showed excellent discrimination for the primary endpoint of SBT outcome (AUC 0.980) and provided early physiological warning of evolving SBT intolerance. Reintubation within 48 h occurred in 7 of 107 extubated patients. Using the EFI threshold of 1.333 derived from the primary endpoint analysis, patients with EFI < 1.333 had significantly lower 48-h freedom from reintubation than those with EFI ≥ 1.333, and all reintubation events occurred in the EFI < 1.333 group. In univariable Cox analyses, EFI, RSBI, MIP, and P0.1 were each associated with reintubation within 48 h after extubation. Because of severe multicollinearity among these indices and the very small number of events, a combined multivariable model was not pursued.

conclusionsEFI measured during SBT was strongly associated with SBT outcome and showed an exploratory association with reintubation within 48 h after extubation. Beyond identifying SBT intolerance, EFI may help identify patients with residual physiological vulnerability after a successful SBT; however, this secondary finding requires cautious interpretation and external validation.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06876792. Registered on March 10, 2025.

Indexed as

Airway ExtubationElectric ImpedanceTomographyAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesROC CurveTime FactorsVentilator WeaningElectrical impedance tomographyFlow indexReintubationSpontaneous breathing trialVentilator weaning

Identifiers

PMID42219497
PMCPMC13435382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.