ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
Association between the cartilage area ratio derived from 3D MRI and patient-reported symptoms in medial knee osteoarthritis.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKnee osteoarthritis (OA) is characterized by progressive cartilage deterioration in the medial compartment. Three-dimensional (3D) MRI enables quantitative assessment of cartilage morphology, and the cartilage area ratio is a sensitive metric that integrates focal defects. This study investigated associations between medial compartment cartilage area ratios and numerical rating scale (NRS) scores in patients undergoing high tibial osteotomy (HTO).
methodsWe analyzed 176 patients who underwent HTO for medial knee OA. All had preoperative 3.0 T MRI and completed a 10-item NRS questionnaire. Total NRS was the sum of Q1-Q4 and Q6-Q10 (Q5 excluded; maximum 90). Cartilage area ratios for the medial femur and medial tibia were calculated using automated 3D MRI analysis, and the medial meniscus coverage ratio was also measured. Item-level associations were assessed using Spearman correlation with Holm correction. Multivariable linear regression of total NRS adjusted for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade was performed. Subgroup analysis in KL grade 3-4 patients and sensitivity analyses progressively excluding high cartilage area ratio values were conducted.
resultsTotal NRS scores showed significant negative correlations with both medial femoral (rs = - 0.31) and medial tibial (rs = - 0.26) cartilage area ratios. Item-level analyses showed the strongest correlations for instability during running (Q8) and grinding/noise (Q9). In multivariable regression, both medial femoral (standardized β = - 0.245, P = 0.007) and medial tibial (standardized β = - 0.226, P = 0.012) cartilage area ratios remained independently associated with total NRS, together with BMI, while age, sex, and KL grade showed no significant associations. The KL grade 3-4 subgroup retained significant correlations (n = 95; femoral rs = - 0.26; tibial rs = - 0.26). Sensitivity analyses confirmed that the inverse correlations were not driven by ceiling effects. Meniscus coverage ratios correlated positively with cartilage area ratios (medial femoral rs = 0.41; medial tibial rs = 0.47) but not with total NRS.
conclusionsLower cartilage area ratios in the medial compartment are independently associated with greater symptom severity, particularly instability during running and mechanical symptoms. This supports cartilage area ratios as clinically relevant structural biomarkers in knee OA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.