ArticleBMC surgery2026
Oblique lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation in a single lateral position for degenerative lumbar diseases.
Article in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) combined with unilateral pedicle screw fixation (OLIF-UPS) performed in a single lateral position for degenerative lumbar diseases.
methodsClinical data of patients who underwent OLIF-UPS in a single lateral position were collected retrospectively. During the same period, patients who received OLIF combined with bilateral pedicle screw fixation (OLIF-BPS) requiring intraoperative position change were enrolled as the control group. Perioperative parameters, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and the modified MacNab criteria were recorded to assess clinical outcomes. Radiographic parameters, including disc height (DH), lumbar lordosis (LL), cage subsidence rate, and interbody fusion rate, were compared between the two groups.
resultsThe operative time in the OLIF-UPS group was significantly shorter than that in the OLIF-BPS group (p <0.001), whereas no significant differences were observed in intraoperative blood loss or postoperative hospital stay between the two groups (p >0.05). Postoperatively, VAS scores for back and leg pain and ODI scores were significantly improved in both groups compared with preoperative values (p <0.001), with a further improvement noted at 1 year postoperatively compared with 1 month postoperatively. Postoperative DH and LL were significantly increased in both groups relative to preoperative measurements (p <0.001). A slight reduction in DH and LL was observed at 1 year postoperatively compared with the immediate postoperative period, but this difference was not statistically significant (p >0.05). The interbody fusion rate was 92.2% in the OLIF-UPS group and 93.5% in the OLIF-BPS group. Both groups achieved favorable functional recovery and high patient satisfaction.
conclusionIn patients with normal to near-normal bone density (T-score > -2.5), Grade I or no spondylolisthesis, no segmental instability, and BMI <30 kg/m2, single-position OLIF-UPS achieves short-term outcomes comparable to OLIF-BPS while significantly reducing operative time. Given the relatively short follow-up period, further long-term observation is warranted to verify its long-term clinical efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.