Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42219466›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2026

CareVR, a Virtual Reality assisted communication training programme to support informal carers of people with psychosis: a feasibility study.

Juliana Onwumere, Laurence Rogers, Kalya Win Aung, Jerome Di Pietro, Lucia Valmaggia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juliana OnwumereDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill , London, SE5 8AF, UK. juliana.1.onwumere@kcl.ac.uk.
Laurence RogersDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill , London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Kalya Win AungDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill , London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Jerome Di PietroDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill , London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Lucia ValmaggiaDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill , London, SE5 8AF, UK.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 308556/Z/23/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily (informal) carers play a vital role in providing care and support to relatives living with a psychotic disorder. Carers, however, often face challenges in communicating effectively with care recipients, particularly in the presence of psychosis symptoms such as delusions and hallucinations. Immersive technologies such as virtual reality have a growing evidence base in mental health treatments in patient groups, but their application to support carers has yet to be established. This study sought to evaluate the feasibility of CareVR, a therapist-facilitated virtual reality (VR) communication skills training programme for informal carers in psychosis. CareVR comprised four individual sessions designed to enhance carers' confidence and effectiveness in their conversations with a care recipient experiencing psychosis symptoms.

methodsAn uncontrolled study design was conducted to ascertain the feasibility and acceptability of CareVR. The VR programme comprised two conversation scenarios between an adult avatar carer and an adult avatar relative (care recipient) with psychosis. Scenarios were delivered from both a third-person (observer) and a first-person (carer) perspective. In each scenario, participants selected how the avatar carer responded to communications from the avatar relative with psychosis. Following each training scenario, participants, supported by a facilitator, reflected on their experiences within the VR environment and their own lived experiences. They were also given opportunities to revisit and revise their choices. The final session focused on integrating learning across the training programme. Feasibility was assessed through recruitment, retention, session attendance, and completion of outcome measures. Acceptability was evaluated using participant feedback, including session satisfaction scores, and achievement of individualised goals.

resultsThe sample comprised twelve participants with diverse caregiving relationships and socio-demographic backgrounds. Recruitment targets were achieved, and all participants attended and completed the full training and assessment measures. Participants reported high levels of satisfaction for individual sessions, the intervention, overall, and goal achievement.

conclusionPreliminary findings from our small and uncontrolled study suggest CareVR might be both feasible and acceptable to informal carers of individuals in psychosis. The study, however, was not designed to evaluate efficacy. Thus, any reports and conclusions of clinical benefits of CareVR require further investigation in a future adequately powered controlled trial. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

CaregiversCommunicationPsychotic DisordersVirtual RealityAdultAvatarFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedCommunication skillsFeasibility studyInformal carersPsychosisVirtual reality (VR)

Identifiers

PMID42219466
PMCPMC13445841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.