Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2026
A novel regional anesthesia technique for retrograde intrarenal surgery in high-risk patients: a prospective observational study.
Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRetrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is a minimally invasive treatment for upper urinary tract stones. However, anesthesia management in high-risk patients with significant comorbidities remains challenging, as general anesthesia poses elevated cardiopulmonary risks and spinal anesthesia is often contraindicated. This study aims to describe a novel regional anesthesia strategy combining ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block at the lateral supra-arcuate ligament (QLB-LSAL) with an anterior approach of sacral plexus block (SPB) as a potential alternative for RIRS in this vulnerable population.
methodsThis prospective observational study enrolled 24 consecutive high-risk adult patients (ASA III-IV) scheduled for RIRS between February 2022 and May 2024. Patients received bilateral anterior approach SPB followed by unilateral QLB-LSAL. Data collected included the successful completion of surgery under regional anesthesia, conversion rates to general anesthesia, intraoperative pain scores (Numerical Rating Scale, NRS), supplemental analgesic requirements, hemodynamic stability, and block- or surgery-related adverse events. Postoperative pain scores, 30-day stone-free rate (SFR), and patient satisfaction were also assessed.
resultsAll 24 patients successfully completed RIRS under the combined regional anesthesia without conversion to general anesthesia. Most patients (83.3%) experienced only mild pain during the procedure (peak NRS ≤ 3), while four (16.7%) required supplemental analgesia or sedation. Hemodynamic parameters remained stable throughout the procedures, and no major anesthesia-related complications were observed. The 30-day SFR was 87.5%, which is comparable to reported outcomes under traditional anesthesia methods. Postoperative pain scores were low (median NRS: 0-1), and 91.6% of patients reported high satisfaction with the anesthetic technique.
conclusionQLB-LSAL combined with anterior approach of SPB appears to be a feasible anesthetic strategy for high-risk patients undergoing RIRS. However, given the observational design and small sample size, these findings should be considered preliminary and require validation in larger studies before broader clinical application. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.