ArticleScientific reports2026
Impact of land use changes on ecosystem services provision in grasslands: a case study from Slovakia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Grasslands play a key role in biomass production and provide multiple ecosystem services. This study examines how land-use changes between 2001 and 2022 have affected the provision of ecosystem services in grasslands, reflecting two decades of agricultural transformation in the EU. The research focuses on the Veselianka River Basin in northern Slovakia, using the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) to select and assess relevant services. Land-use dynamics were analysed using GIS, while selected ecosystem services were evaluated using indicator-based approaches under the CICES. Grasslands covered 25.8% of the study area in 2001, declining slightly to 23.5% by 2022, primarily due to land abandonment, settlement expansion, and the development of recreational facilities. Transition analysis showed the largest increases in shrubland/small woodland and built-up areas, indicating progressive restructuring of the rural landscape. Ecosystem services assessment showed that extensively managed grasslands, particularly hay meadows, mesophilic pastures, and species-rich Nardus grasslands, had the highest multifunctional value. These habitats provided strong potential for biomass production, biodiversity conservation, pollination support, and cultural services linked to landscape aesthetics and recreation. In contrast, land abandonment and infrastructure expansion reduced habitat continuity and may weaken long-term ecosystem service capacity. The results highlight the importance of maintaining traditional extensive grassland management to preserve multifunctional rural landscapes. Integrating ecosystem service assessments into agri-environmental policy and spatial planning can support sustainable land management in mountain regions of Central Europe and comparable rural landscapes elsewhere.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.