SynthesisJournal of public health dentistry2026
Custodial Dental Care in Federal Courts: A Systematic Review of Appellate Decisions and Implications for Public Health.
Synthesis in Journal of public health dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo examine how federal appellate courts evaluate constitutional claims concerning custodial dental care and to characterize the clinical and procedural features of these cases.
methodsDecisions of the U.S. courts of appeals issued between 1980 and 2025 were identified through structured database searches. Cases substantively evaluating dental care were coded for severe pain, infection, abscess (coded separately), functional impairment, delay, custody type, representation status, defendant level, and appellate outcome. Descriptive statistics summarized case characteristics, and logistic regression evaluated associations between selected variables and appellate outcomes.
resultsA total of 182 appellate decisions met inclusion criteria, of which 174 evaluated adequacy of care. Severe pain was described in 86% of coded cases and functional impairment in 62%. Infection was documented in 41% of cases, with an abscess specifically identified in 16%. Delay was alleged in 73% of cases. Overall, 35% of decisions resulted in reversal or remand. Among cases with documented delay duration, the median delay was substantially longer in plaintiff-favorable cases, and delays exceeding 90 days were associated with higher odds of reversal or remand.
conclusionsAppellate review emphasizes documented awareness and response rather than equivalence to community standards. This legal threshold does not ensure timely clinical resolution. Public health evaluation of custodial dental systems should consider disease progression and access to definitive treatment in addition to legal compliance. Improvements are likely to depend on system-level monitoring of access and timeliness of care rather than litigation alone, reflecting the distinction between legal sufficiency and clinical adequacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.