ArticleJournal of animal science2026
Voluntary intake of dry matter and water of sheep fed low dry matter forages and consequences for nitrogen excretion.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low dry matter (DM) forages (<16%) have been reported to restrict voluntary intake. However, New Zealand temperate grazing systems use a wide range of low DM% forages in high production systems. Interest in mitigating nitrogen (N) losses from farming systems has increased use of low DM% pasture forbs to dilute urine N concentrations. Voluntary DM intake (DMI), water and N intake, urine volume, and N excretion were measured in young growing sheep fed a range of autumn-harvested, low DM% plantain, chicory, and ryegrass cultivars. Four diet-treatment groups of eight young male sheep were used in each of three consecutive runs, with 7 d total urine and fecal collection in metabolism crates. Feed, refusal, urine, and fecal assessment of DM% and N% enabled DM, water and N intake, urine and fecal water, and N excretion to be calculated. The association of DM% and DMI, and both water intake and suspected phyto-diuretics with urine output, were also assessed. Voluntary DMI considered high (>25 g/kg BW) were observed in all diet-treatments (DM%: 8.5%-16.0%), was above 30 g/kg BW in eight of ten diet-treatments (8.5%-13.3%) and was lowest in the highest diet-treatment DM%. The association of DM% and DMI was negative, weak (r2= 0.22) but significant (P < 0.05). Total water intakes were high across all diet-treatments (126-390 mL/kg BW/d), but least in a ryegrass diet-treatment. Urine volumes were high (3,697-11,654 mL/d), and greatest in a chicory diet-treatment. The association of feed DM% with both total water intake (r2=0.83) and urine output (r2 >0.90) was negative, strong and significant (P < 0.001), while that of forage concentrations of suspected phyto-diuretics with urine output was negative, weak (r2 = 0.20-0.44), but significant (P < 0.01). Urine DM voided was high with greater volumes, suggesting higher costs. Total N output and urinary N output were greater in plantain diet-treatments, while the proportion of excreted N in urine was lower (P < 0.05) in all plantains compared to chicory and ryegrass diet-treatments, and the urine N% was greatest in ryegrass, and similar among the plantain and chicory diet-treatments. Conclusions: high DMI can be achieved with low DM% forages in young growing sheep, and the feed water intake, not phyto-diuretics, produces the observed high urine volume. Low DM% temperate forages are therefore suitable for N excretion mitigation via increased urine volume and urinary N% dilution, but urine energy and mineral costs may increase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.