Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42218735›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026

Orphan Designation for Drugs Approved in the United States and European Union: A Comparative Analysis.

Enrico Costa, Joseph S Ross, Aaron S Kesselheim

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Enrico CostaItalian Medicines Agency (AIFA), Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2616-994X
Joseph S RossDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9218-3320
Aaron S KesselheimProgram On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8867-2666

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rare disease drugs represent a significant portion of new drug approvals, but the United States and European Union (EU) have differing approaches to Orphan Drug designations, impacting application fees and market exclusivity. This cross-sectional study analyzed the first rare disease drug approvals in the United States and EU from 2011 to 2020 using data from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) databases, describing similarities and differences in how both regions grant Orphan Drug designations. Out of 344 rare disease drug approvals, 336 (97.7%) were licensed by the FDA with Orphan Drug designations, 139 (40.4%) by the EMA with Orphan Drug designations; 131 (38.1%) were licensed with Orphan Drug designations by both the FDA and EMA, while 103 (29.9%) were approved in the EU without this designation. Additionally, 110 (32.0%) had approval from one agency only, with 102 (29.7%) by the FDA and 8 (2.3%) by the EMA. Both agencies were most consistent in granting Orphan Drug designations for advanced therapies (75.0%) and genetic diseases (55.4%). EMA approvals were lacking for tropical diseases (12.7%), while EU designations were often absent for diseases not considered distinct entities, such as subsets of cancers or pediatric indications of prevalent diseases. These findings reflect the differing regulatory frameworks and practices between the United States and the EU. Policymakers seeking to improve rare disease drug approval could prioritize incentives for the development of treatments for truly rare diseases as opposed to subsets of more common conditions for which incentives have already been established or create pathways that tackle scientific and societal challenges.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalOrphan Drug ProductionRare DiseasesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, FactualEuropean UnionHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42218735
PMCPMC13339051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.