Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42218732›Full record

ArticleAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2026

The Prevalence and Risk Factors for at-Risk MASH and Advanced Liver Fibrosis in People With Metabolic Risk Factors in Primary Care.

Leon A Adams, Shaoke Lei, Luis Calzadilla-Bertot, Silja Schrader, Sophie Frear, Chian Zhou, Sarah E Heywood, Jon Emery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leon A AdamsMedical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Shaoke LeiDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care & Collaborative Centre for Genomic Cancer Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Luis Calzadilla-BertotMedical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Silja SchraderDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care & Collaborative Centre for Genomic Cancer Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Sophie FrearMedical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Chian ZhouNovo Nordisk, Sydney, Australia.
Sarah E HeywoodNovo Nordisk, Sydney, Australia.
Jon EmeryDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care & Collaborative Centre for Genomic Cancer Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

Novo Nordisk
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe majority of the burden of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) exists in primary care; however, the prevalence of severe disease in patients with metabolic dysfunction remains poorly described.

methodsA cross-sectional study of 84 general practices located in Victoria, Australia identified patients with metabolic dysfunction over a 12 month period from the PATRON data repository. At-risk MASH was defined using the Fibrotic NASH Index (FNI) based on laboratory data. Patients needing further liver assessment were defined by FIB-4 ≥ 1.3 (≥ 2.0 if 65+ years) and = < 2.67. Advanced liver fibrosis was defined as a FIB-4 of > 2.67.

results110,938 individuals were identified with metabolic dysfunction. Of those with a FNI available (n = 16,586), the prevalence of At-risk MASH was 24.3%. Among those with a FIB-4 available (n = 64,948), 16.3% required further liver assessment, while the prevalence of advanced fibrosis was 4.3%. On multivariate analysis, male sex, type 2 diabetes, and hypertension were associated with At-risk MASH, whereas male sex and type 2 diabetes were associated with advanced liver fibrosis. Socio-economic disadvantage was a risk factor for both At-risk MASH and advanced liver fibrosis.

conclusionsSignificant liver disease was observed in a substantial proportion of patients with metabolic dysfunction within primary care, particularly among patients with type 2 diabetes, supporting the rationale for risk stratification. Associations with socio-economic disadvantage highlight the need for societal and public health policy change to improve liver outcomes.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Fatty LiverLiver CirrhosisAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalencePrimary Health CareRisk FactorsSex FactorsVictoriaepidemiologyfatty liverrisk stratificationscreeningsocio‐economic disadvantagetype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID42218732
PMCPMC13465969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.