SynthesisPsychiatry and clinical neurosciences2026
Safety and tolerance of oral ketamine: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oral ketamine has gained increasing interest beyond anesthesia, particularly for treatment-resistant depression, chronic pain, and pediatric procedural sedation. Despite expanding off-label use, there is no standardized pharmaceutical formulation, and long-term safety remains uncertain. A synthesis of evidence on safety and tolerability of the oral route is therefore needed to inform clinical practice and regulatory development. This systematic review evaluated the safety and tolerability profile of oral ketamine in humans and characterized dosing strategies across randomized controlled trials. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to November 2025 (PROSPERO CRD420251065295). Randomized placebo-controlled trials evaluating oral (es)ketamine in any clinical population were included. Primary outcomes were safety and tolerability. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB2 tool, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Eighteen trials were included, comprising adults, children, and healthy volunteers. In depression studies (n = 5; 427 participants), adverse effects were predominantly mild and transient. Pediatric premedication trials (n = 239) reported transient neurological effects without clinically significant safety concerns. Pain and experimental studies (n = 372) showed mostly mild adverse events, with dissociative symptoms at higher doses. Comparative analyses indicated higher rates of dizziness, sedation, and dissociative symptoms with ketamine, while serious adverse events were rare. Overall, oral ketamine demonstrates a favorable short-term safety profile. However, the certainty of evidence is low, and long-term safety remains uncertain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.