ArticleMicrobiome2026
Remodelling of cystic fibrosis respiratory microbiota in response to extended elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor therapy.
Article in Microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCystic fibrosis (CF) has profoundly changed since the introduction of CF Transmembrane Conductance Regulator modulator therapies (CFTRmt), a class of medications that improve function of the CFTR protein encoded by certain CF-causing gene mutations. Amongst these, the triple combination therapy elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI) has been the most impactful and widely used to date. Given chronic respiratory infection and concomitant inflammation is the leading cause of morbidity and early mortality for the majority in CF, what is not certain are the long-term effects of ETI therapy on the respiratory microbiota and pathogens embedded within. Here, we assessed the effects of ETI CFTRmt over 3 years on the respiratory microbiota, using sputum and cough swab samples, from a multi-centre cohort of 276 adults with CF (awCF) from 6 CF centres in the UK, USA, and Canada, and compared to a non-CF healthy cohort.
resultsUsing Kruskal-Wallis analyses with post hoc Dunn's tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and PERMANOVA analyses with Bonferroni correction, we determined that respiratory microbiota characteristics (diversity, dominance, and composition) became decreasingly like those of awCF pre-ETI and remodelled to align more with the healthy cohort, where canonical CF pathogens increasingly became less ecologically important in terms of their distributions and abundances across awCF with increased duration on therapy. However, the on-ETI microbiota was impeded from becoming fully 'healthy' due to continued antibiotic exposure and irreversible lung damage experienced by awCF. Specifically, we found that azithromycin, an antibiotic widely used principally for its immunomodulatory benefits, was associated with adverse effects on the respiratory microbiota nullifying the observed positive effects of ETI treatment. Our results indicated that when administered alongside ETI therapy, azithromycin contributed to a pre-ETI microbiota dysbiosis and enabled enhanced persistence of emblematic CF pathogens.
conclusionsThe highly anticipated introduction of ETI CFTRmt has greatly changed the course of CF for many people living with this inherited disease. Here, we find that ETI CFTRmt enabled positive remodelling of the respiratory microbiota towards a healthy-like state. However, azithromycin appeared to impede total remodelling, making it an ideal candidate for evaluation for discontinuation in the CFTRmt era. While traditional pathogens become less ecologically important, the potential evolution and emergence of virulent strains should be investigated. Additionally, the impacts and implications of ETI therapy on the understudied fungal microbiota should also be explored. Video Abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.