ArticleStem cell research & therapy2026
SPHERpower: MSC spheroid-based bioequivalent lead to the efficient restoration of the scarred vocal folds.
Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell-based therapy has become an attractive option to restore the vocal folds (VF) after scarring. Despite that first clinical trials using mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) suspension has been launched, there is still an issue of retaining cells at implantation site to prolong their effects. Therefore, cell spheroids are considered to be a part of next generation bioequivalents. This study aims to reveal the safety and efficacy of MSC spheroid-based bioequivalent in treating VF scars in comparison with cell suspension. To evaluate this approach in vivo, a rabbit vocal fold scar model was established in 48 male rabbits, which were allocated to four groups: untreated control, PEG-fibrin, PEG-fibrin with MSC suspension, and PEG-fibrin with MSC spheroids. In 3 months post operation, in group where the MSC suspension-based bioequivalent was implanted, the mature connective tissue was located beneath the epithelium without dystrophic changes and had a relatively loose ECM; the thickness of the lamia propria was higher than that in the intact VF. In group where we used the MSC spheroid-based bioequivalent the loose connective tissue consisted of longitudinally oriented collagen fibers, spindle-shaped fibroblasts; the lamia propria was relatively thin (116.42 ± 42.77 μm) and loose and did not differ from the intact VF. Both types enabled the VF restoration; nevertheless, the use of MSC spheroids lead to more efficient regeneration: the tissue architectonics and mechanical properties of the treated VF was more similar to those of the intact VF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.