Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42218554›Full record

ArticleStem cell research & therapy2026

SPHERpower: MSC spheroid-based bioequivalent lead to the efficient restoration of the scarred vocal folds.

Anastasia Shpichka, Mikhail Svistushkin, Yana Khristidis, Polina Bikmulina, Natalia Serejnikova, Alexey Fayzullin, Gaia Lebedeva, Alesia Bakulina, Anna Zolotova, Igor Zinchenko and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Anastasia Shpichka *Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Mikhail Svistushkin *Department for ENT Diseases, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Yana Khristidis *Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Polina BikmulinaInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Natalia SerejnikovaInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Alexey FayzullinInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Gaia LebedevaDepartment for ENT Diseases, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Alesia BakulinaInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Anna ZolotovaDepartment for ENT Diseases, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Igor ZinchenkoDepartment for ENT Diseases, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Nastasia KoshelevaInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Nafisa FayzullinaInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Mikhail BelovolovFiber Optics Research Ctr., Moscow, Russia.
Yuri EfremovInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Anna SolovievaDepartment of Polymers and Composites, N.N. Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Valeriy SvistushkinDepartment for ENT Diseases, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Peter TimashevInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia. timashev_p_s@staff.sechenov.ru.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation 075-15-2024-640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-based therapy has become an attractive option to restore the vocal folds (VF) after scarring. Despite that first clinical trials using mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) suspension has been launched, there is still an issue of retaining cells at implantation site to prolong their effects. Therefore, cell spheroids are considered to be a part of next generation bioequivalents. This study aims to reveal the safety and efficacy of MSC spheroid-based bioequivalent in treating VF scars in comparison with cell suspension. To evaluate this approach in vivo, a rabbit vocal fold scar model was established in 48 male rabbits, which were allocated to four groups: untreated control, PEG-fibrin, PEG-fibrin with MSC suspension, and PEG-fibrin with MSC spheroids. In 3 months post operation, in group where the MSC suspension-based bioequivalent was implanted, the mature connective tissue was located beneath the epithelium without dystrophic changes and had a relatively loose ECM; the thickness of the lamia propria was higher than that in the intact VF. In group where we used the MSC spheroid-based bioequivalent the loose connective tissue consisted of longitudinally oriented collagen fibers, spindle-shaped fibroblasts; the lamia propria was relatively thin (116.42 ± 42.77 μm) and loose and did not differ from the intact VF. Both types enabled the VF restoration; nevertheless, the use of MSC spheroids lead to more efficient regeneration: the tissue architectonics and mechanical properties of the treated VF was more similar to those of the intact VF.

Indexed as

CicatrixMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationSpheroids, CellularVocal CordsAnimalsMalePolyethylene GlycolsRabbitsPolyethylene GlycolsBioequivalentMesenchymal stromal cellsPEG-fibrinRegenerative medicineSpheroidTissue engineeringVocal folds

Identifiers

PMID42218554
PMCPMC13439855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.