ArticleBorderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation2026
Effectiveness of online family connections for family members of people with BPD: a naturalistic comparison with the face-to-face format.
Article in Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBorderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is a common condition with significant negative impacts on relatives due to its interpersonal instability and suicidal behaviors. Family Connections (FC) is currently the most empirically supported intervention for family members of individuals with BPD. However, access to FC remains limited. Online delivery could overcome geographic barriers, as digital formats have shown efficacy in psychotherapies for patients, though little is known about their effectiveness for family-oriented interventions. During the COVID-19 crisis, rapid adaptations of psychotherapeutic programs such as FC to online formats created an opportunity to collect data. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the online FC with face-to-face format.
methodThis multicenter naturalistic study extended a previous project involving French-speaking FC participants. The program was first delivered face-to-face (n = 141) and then online (n = 27). FC is a 12-week group intervention providing psychoeducation about BPD and teaching coping skills derived from Dialectical Behavior Therapy.
resultsGroups were comparable at baseline, except for certain variables. Controlling for baseline scores, multiple linear regressions showed no significant group differences for post-intervention burden (b=-0.59, p = 0.825) or depression (b = 1.37, p = 0.398). However, the online group improved more in emotion dysregulation (b=-9.05, p = 0.003) but less in coping (b=-0.79, p < 0.000). DISCUSSION: Findings support the online FC format as comparably effective to the face-to-face version, suggesting its potential to enhance accessibility without compromising outcomes. Replication in randomized designs is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.