ArticleCritical care (London, England)2026
Effect of restrictive fluid balance in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a target trial emulation.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo estimate the effect of restrictive fluid management on renal function and mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) at high risk of developing positive fluid balance.
methodsWe conducted a target trial emulation using data from 12 intensive care units in Queensland, Australia (2015-2021). Adults with AKI within 72 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and an AKI-Fluid Balance Risk Score ≥ 32 were included. The intervention comprised conservative crystalloid administration, restricted nutritional fluid intake, and diuretic use for 72 h. We estimated per-protocol effects using a sequential doubly robust estimator for longitudinal modified treatment policies. The primary outcome was AKI Rank at day 7; secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality.
resultsAmong 8,685 patients, the intervention was associated with substantial reduction in fluid balance (- 2,304 mL at 72 h; 95% CI, - 2,465 to - 2,144) and modest improvement in AKI Rank (mean difference - 0.8; 95% confidence interval (CI), - 1.3 to - 0.3). Heterogeneity by AKI stage was observed: the intervention was associated with improved renal function in stage 1 AKI (mean difference - 3.1; 95% CI, - 3.8 to - 2.5) but worse outcomes in stage 2 AKI (mean difference 4.5; 95% CI, 3.8 to 5.1) and stage 3 AKI (mean difference 6.3; 95% CI, 4.7 to 7.9) with increased 30-day mortality (relative risk 1.20; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.33). Effective sample sizes were limited (7-16%), indicating reliance on extrapolation.
conclusionsRestrictive fluid management was associated with improved renal function in early AKI but potentially harmful effects in stages 2 and 3 AKI. These hypothesis-generating findings suggest any future trial should incorporate safety criteria for patients with advanced renal injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.