ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2026
Assessing the factors influencing the quality of pocket-conditioned 3D generative models.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Controllable molecular generation with fine-tuned flow-matching model.Communications chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Structure-based drug discovery (SBDD) aims to identify novel molecules that bind to therapeutic protein targets. The vast chemical space and limitations of traditional approaches make this task challenging. Recent advances in AI-generative models, such as flow matching, can produce novel, pocket-conditioned molecular structures directly in three-dimensional space. However, most pocket conditioned models in the literature are trained on structures derived from the Protein Data Bank (PDB), which contains structures with varying quality and inconsistent annotation. Moreover, the PDB is enriched with cofactors and natural products, thereby poorly representing real world SBDD scenarios. The relatively limited number of ligand series within the same pockets also hinder the model's ability to learn protein-ligand interactions effectively. Here for the first time we report the results of training pocket-conditioned generative models on internal crystallography data from a large pharmaceutical company. We also investigate other key determinants of model performance, such as inclusion of hydrogens and pretraining on unconditional data. We evaluate how each factor affects the generative quality of the ligands across the diverse training settings. Our results provide practical guidelines for the development of more effective 3D generative models for SBDD and highlight key directions for future research toward reliable, pocket-aware molecular design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.