ArticleBMC health services research2026
Rheumatology nurses' perspectives of automatic substitution of biological medicines in community pharmacies and its safety: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAutomatic substitution of biological medicines refers to a dispensing practice in community pharmacies in which a pharmacist substitutes a prescribed biological medicine with an interchangeable biologic product without contacting the prescriber. Automatic substitution of biological medicines in community pharmacies offers one possibility to reduce increased healthcare expenditures through price competition among biological medicines. The implementation of automatic substitution requires active engagement, information and coordination to maintain medication safety. Research on healthcare professionals' perceptions towards automatic substitution remains limited. This study provides insight into automatic substitution from the perspective of rheumatology nurses, whose role in rheumatology patient care is essential. The Aim of the study was to explore rheumatology nurses' perceptions of automatic substitution of biological medicines and its safe implementation.
methodsData were collected through individual semi-structured interviews in 2025. The participants were rheumatology nurses (n = 10) with clinical experience in patient care, including injection and device guidance for patients. The data were analysed with inductive content analysis. To ensure comprehensive and transparent reporting, the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist was utilised.
resultsFour categories were identified: (1) Perceptions of automatic substitution, (2) Factors supporting the implementation of automatic substitution, (3) Concerns related to automatic substitution, and (4) Safe implementation of automatic substitution. All interviewees acknowledged the critical roles of community pharmacies and healthcare personnel in ensuring safe implementation. Perceptions of automatic substitution were positive, although concerns were raised about medication-related issues and work-related challenges such as increased workload in patient counselling. Factors supporting the implementation of automatic substitution were mainly related to the suitability of biological medicines for substitution, and patients' experience of biological medicines and generic substitution.
conclusionsRheumatology nurses' perceptions of automatic substitution were generally positive, and they considered biological medicines suitable for substitution. However, their concerns regarding work-related challenges and medication-related issues highlight the importance of ensuring sufficient resources to sustain patient safety. Successful and safe implementation of automatic substitution will require comprehensive patient counselling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.