ArticleMovement ecology2026
Greater pollen-mediated gene flow among than within populations of a bumblebee-pollinated forest herb despite habitat fragmentation.
Article in Movement ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPollen flow within and among spatially isolated forest herb populations in agricultural landscapes depends on the movement activity of their pollinators. For central-place and traplining foragers, such as bumblebees, this movement activity is expected to reflect how they exploit floral resources across the landscape. However, it remains unclear how the bumblebees' foraging behavior actually shapes the mating patterns of forest herbs within and among forest patches.
methodsHere, we conducted a landscape genetic analysis of two generations of the forest herb P. multiflorum using microsatellites to investigate (A) the proportions of pollen-mediated gene flow within and among forest patches, (B) how the spatial position and size of shoot clusters influence the pollen-mediated gene flow within forest patches, and (C) how landscape composition affects pollen immigration rates into forest patches.
resultsWe found that pollen immigration rates per pollen receptor plant were high, with only a few shoot clusters within a forest patch serving as pollen donors. Larger shoot clusters had higher probabilities of donating pollen. Both pollen immigration rates per pollen receptor and the genetic diversity of the offspring were significantly affected by maize cover and linear landscape elements in the surrounding landscape. We found that in landscapes dominated by land-use types with low floral-resource availability, higher pollen immigration rates into wild plant populations do not necessarily lead to higher genetic diversity.
conclusionsOur results suggest that trapline foraging promotes greater pollen flow among forest patches than within them, and that shoot clusters within a forest patch contribute unequally to sexual reproduction. In the studied agricultural landscape, semi-natural habitat patches with high floral-resource availability may either compete for or facilitate pollinator activity and the resulting gene flow among forest patches, while smaller patches act rather as stepping stone habitats, larger ones may retain pollinators and distract them from less attractive forest herb populations. Similarly, linear landscape elements oriented towards pollen receptors increased both the amount and allelic richness of incoming pollen, whereas those oriented orthogonally had the opposite effect. The study also emphasized that self-incompatible bumblebee-pollinated plant species in resource-poor landscapes may form metapopulation with regular pollen exchange which does not automatically lead to high levels of introduced new alleles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.