Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42218479›Full record

ArticleCell communication and signaling : CCS2026

Macrophages sense and follow physiologically relevant K

Oreoluwa V Griffiths, Mary Krystelle Catacutan, Hidaya Abdul Kader, Fatima H Labeed, Rebecca Lewis, Srdjan Cirovic, Michael Pycraft Hughes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell communication and signaling : CCS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Oreoluwa V GriffithsCentre for Biomedical Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK.
Mary Krystelle CatacutanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Biotechnology, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Hidaya Abdul KaderDepartment of Biology, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE.
Fatima H LabeedDepartment of Biology, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE.
Rebecca LewisSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK.
Srdjan CirovicCentre for Biomedical Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK.
Michael Pycraft HughesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Biotechnology, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, UAE. Michael.Hughes@ku.ac.ae.

Funding

Khalifa University of Science, Technology and Research, United Arab Emirates KU-2022-020United Arab Emirates University G00005469
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany cells respond to changes in concentration of extracellular molecules (chemotaxis) by directing migration towards increased concentration of molecules such as food or signaling molecules, or away from toxins. Similarly, some cells respond to extracellular electric fields by migrating towards cathode or anode (electrotaxis). However, only motile bacteria are known to respond to extracellular ion gradients (ionotaxis), with no similar reports in mammalian cells.

methodsWe used microfluidic gradient chips to examine the migration of human macrophages in concentration gradients of sodium, potassium and chloride.

resultsAll three ion gradients significantly directed motion in the direction of the gradient compared to cell migration at constant concentration. Macrophages showed significant migration towards higher concentrations of cations. Gradients as low as ± 0.025% over ambient ion concentration could be sensed. The results suggest that macrophages use small changes in extracellular K + and Na+, to identify injury sites, given that increases in local K DISCUSSION: We also considered the implications of this effect for the phenomenon of electrotaxis. Electric fields induce dipoles at the cell surface, aligned with the field. If these interact with extracellular ions, they will generate local ion gradients across the cell, which the cell can then follow. Hence it is the induced gradient, not the electric field, which the cell interacts with.

conclusionsThis work suggests that local variation in ion concentrations may be a previously unexplored mechanism for cellular communication with ramifications for cell function, developmental biology and cancer.

Indexed as

ChemotaxisMacrophagesPotassiumSodiumTaxis ResponseCell MovementHumansPotassiumSodiumChemotaxisElectrotaxisIonotaxisPatterning

Identifiers

PMID42218479
PMCPMC13436133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.