Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42218465›Full record

ArticleConflict and health2026

Household food insecurity status in Gulina District, zone 4 of conflict affected Afar Regional State, Northeast Ethiopia.

Fiseha Tsegaye, Goitom Sisay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conflict and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fiseha TsegayeDepartment of Geography and Environmental Studies, Kotebe University of Education, P. O. Box 31248, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Goitom SisayDepartment of Geography and Environmental Studies, Kotebe University of Education, P. O. Box 31248, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. goitom.sisay@kue.edu.et.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigating the Household Food insecurity situation of conflict affected communities has increasingly become a widespread issue around the world. Gulina District, situated within Zone 4 of the Afar region, faced significant challenges related to the impacts of conflict, which severely affect household food security. The study aimed to assess the household food security status in the conflict-affected Gulina District. The study used a cross-sectional study design using a combination of quantitative and qualitative data collection techniques. Data was collected from 366 randomly selected household heads. Food Consumption Score (FCS), Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS), and Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) were among the metrics utilized in the survey questionnaire to evaluate the level of household food security status. Employing HFIAS, 82.8% of households are food insecure; of these, 61.5% and 21.3% are classified as mildly and moderately food insecure, respectively. This demonstrated the problem of household food insecurity's seeming prevalence. Moreover, the HDDS and FCS survey result show that the study area is mainly characterized by the high consumption of milk and relatively moderate intake of staples and animal protein, but the low consumption of fruits and vegetables due to the pastoral nature of the community.

Indexed as

ConflictDietary diversityFood consumption scoreHousehold food insecurityHousehold food insecurity access scale

Identifiers

PMID42218465
PMCPMC13430794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.