ArticleConflict and health2026
Household food insecurity status in Gulina District, zone 4 of conflict affected Afar Regional State, Northeast Ethiopia.
Article in Conflict and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Household food insecurity status in Gulina District, zone 4 of conflict affected Afar Regional State, Northeast Ethiopia.Conflict and health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Investigating the Household Food insecurity situation of conflict affected communities has increasingly become a widespread issue around the world. Gulina District, situated within Zone 4 of the Afar region, faced significant challenges related to the impacts of conflict, which severely affect household food security. The study aimed to assess the household food security status in the conflict-affected Gulina District. The study used a cross-sectional study design using a combination of quantitative and qualitative data collection techniques. Data was collected from 366 randomly selected household heads. Food Consumption Score (FCS), Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS), and Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) were among the metrics utilized in the survey questionnaire to evaluate the level of household food security status. Employing HFIAS, 82.8% of households are food insecure; of these, 61.5% and 21.3% are classified as mildly and moderately food insecure, respectively. This demonstrated the problem of household food insecurity's seeming prevalence. Moreover, the HDDS and FCS survey result show that the study area is mainly characterized by the high consumption of milk and relatively moderate intake of staples and animal protein, but the low consumption of fruits and vegetables due to the pastoral nature of the community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.