Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42218448›Full record

ArticleCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2026

Retirement and healthcare expenditures of urban Chinese males: causal evidence from the CHARLS 2020 wave.

Maoguo Wu, Yan Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maoguo WuSILC Business School, Shanghai University, 20 Chengzhong Road, Shanghai, 201899, China. wumaoguo@shu.edu.cn.
Yan ChenSILC Business School, Shanghai University, 20 Chengzhong Road, Shanghai, 201899, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChina's low male statutory retirement age (60) and its rapidly aging population make the causal effect of retirement on healthcare expenditures a pressing policy question. Centralized drug procurement, nationwide DRG/DIP payment reform, and expanded insurance coverage have reshaped the cost environment in which retirement‑related spending decisions occur, calling for up‑to‑date causal estimates.

methodsWe use the most recent publicly available wave of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS 2020, Wave 5) and apply a fuzzy regression discontinuity design that exploits the male statutory retirement age as an exogenous source of variation. The sample consists of urban males aged 55-65 (N = 2,538), the group for whom the retirement cut‑off is unambiguous and whose healthcare‑expenditure decisions are most directly affected by formal urban insurance systems. Expenditures are disaggregated into self‑treatment (medications and preventive products) and institution‑related (outpatient and inpatient) categories, and comprehensive mechanism tests are conducted across spending ability, health conditions, time availability, and lifestyle channels.

resultsRetirement significantly increases self‑treatment expenditures, with out‑of‑pocket self‑treatment rising by approximately ¥14-16 per week at the age‑60 cutoff. The magnitude is modest, consistent with the post‑2018 drug‑price reductions that exceeded 50%. Institution‑related expenditures decline; out‑of‑pocket inpatient spending falls by roughly 40% relative to the pre‑retirement baseline. The gap between total and out‑of‑pocket expenditures is narrow, reflecting the decline in the national out‑of‑pocket share to 27%. The spending‑ability channel is weak, while health conditions, physical activity, and social engagement remain the dominant mechanisms. Education‑level and household‑size gradients are present but modest in magnitude.

conclusionsThe retirement‑expenditure nexus in urban China is characterized by a shift toward self‑treatment and away from institutional utilization. Post‑2018 reforms have shaped the economic magnitudes of these effects, producing a contemporary benchmark for retirement‑policy calibration and health‑insurance design. Extensions to female and rural populations are warranted. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

CHARLS 2020ChinaFuzzy regression discontinuityHealthcare expendituresHealth reformRetirement

Identifiers

PMID42218448
PMCPMC13360192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.