ArticleBMC psychiatry2026
An exploratory data-driven stratification of depression based on functional network connectivity and symptom profiles suggests heterogeneous responses to iTBS.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe marked clinical and biological heterogeneity of major depressive disorder (MDD) suggests that it may be more appropriately conceptualized as a syndrome with multiple biologically relevant patterns. However, traditional stratification approaches based on either clinical symptomatology or isolated biological markers, including neuroimaging data, often fail to capture the complex brain-behavior relationships underlying MDD.
methodsIn this study, we applied regularized canonical correlation analysis to capture multivariate covariation between functional network connectivity (FNC) and symptom profiles. Based on the resulting low-dimensional representation, we performed clustering to explore potential stratification patterns in a cohort of 51 patients with MDD and examined whether these patterns were associated with variation in response to intermittent theta burst stimulation. Transcriptional signatures related to pattern-specific FNC abnormalities were further explored using partial least squares regression.
resultsOur study found two stratification patterns in MDD. After false discovery rate correction, only increased connectivity between the ventral default mode network (vDMN) and cerebellar network in MDD2 relative to healthy controls remained significant. In exploratory uncorrected analyses, MDD1 was characterized by increased connectivity between the vDMN and salience network, as well as between the dorsal DMN (dDMN) and orbitofrontal cortex, together with greater depressive severity and more prominent appetite disturbance, whereas MDD2 showed broader connectivity increases and more prominent sleep disturbance. Imaging transcriptomic analysis provided complementary molecular contextualization. Treatment-related connectivity changes were mainly observed in MDD2, while patients within both stratification patterns showed symptom improvement, with appetite disturbance improving in MDD1 and sleep disturbance improving in MDD2. Finally, prediction analyses suggested potential prognostic relevance of baseline FNC features, particularly the connectivity between the dDMN and right executive control network.
conclusionsBy integrating neuroimaging, clinical symptomatology, and transcriptomic data, this study offers a preliminary, data-driven framework for exploring heterogeneity in MDD and its potential relevance to treatment sensitivity. These results may inform future efforts to refine biologically grounded stratification strategies for neuromodulation-based treatment prediction.
trial registrationThe clinical trial number is ChiCTR2100054793, and the registration date is December 27, 2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.