ArticleBMC psychiatry2026
Co-existence of clinical high-risk for psychosis and bipolar disorder: a multi-dimensional psychopathological analysis.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile the clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR-P) has been extensively studied and the clinical high-risk for bipolar disorder (CHR-BD) has gained increasing attention, overlapping symptoms-such as mood instability and subclinical psychotic features-complicate diagnostic boundaries. We aimed to investigate the psychopathological characteristics of high-risk individuals to address the feasibility of early-stage diagnostic differentiation. We hypothesized that CHR-P and CHR-BD could co-occur and that symptom structure would differ depending on overlap status.
methodsWe recruited 231 participants without formal psychiatric diagnoses from a prospective cohort established at the psychiatry clinic of Seoul National University Hospital. We identified CHR-P and CHR-BD using the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes (SIPS) and the Bipolar Prodrome Symptom Interview and Scale (BPSS), respectively. Participants were classified into CHR-P-only, CHR-BD-only, and CHR-P/BD-overlap groups. Participants were then evaluated across multiple psychopathological domains, including delusional ideation, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, perceptual abnormalities, depressive and manic symptoms, and global clinical severity. Symptom severity, inter-domain correlations, and symptom network structures were analyzed and compared across groups.
resultsThe overlap was substantial: among 158 individuals meeting CHR-P criteria, 106 (67.1%) also met CHR-BD criteria, and among 179 individuals meeting CHR-BD criteria, 106 (59.2%) also met CHR-P criteria. The subgroup distribution was 52 CHR-P-only, 73 CHR-BD-only, and 106 CHR-P/BD-overlap. Symptom structures differed by overlap status. CHR-P-only showed significantly greater social withdrawal compared to other groups. CHR-P/BD-overlap had more severe mood, delusional, obsessive-compulsive, and hallucinatory symptoms. Correlation analysis showed weaker interconnections among symptom domains in CHR-P-only. Network analysis revealed four fragmented communities in CHR-P-only, two tightly integrated communities in CHR-BD-only, and partial integration across three communities in CHR-P/BD-overlap. Central symptoms varied: paranoia in CHR-P-only; mood symptoms and obsessive thoughts in CHR-BD-only; mood symptoms and perceptual abnormalities with religious themes in CHR-P/BD-overlap.
conclusionsHigh-risk states for psychosis and bipolar disorder frequently co-occur, suggesting that early psychopathology extends beyond the prodrome of any single disorder. Distinct patterns of symptom networks across high-risk subgroups underscore the value of dimensional and spectrum-based approaches to early psychopathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.