ArticleBMC pediatrics2026
Clinical analysis of tracheobronchial foreign body aspiration in children aged six years and older.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveForeign body aspiration (FBA) occurs across all age groups but predominantly affects children under three years of age. Clinical evidence suggests that tracheobronchial foreign bodies in school-age children (> 6 years) present distinct characteristics in terms of foreign body types, clinical progression, and management strategies compared to younger children. This study aimed to analyze the clinical features and outcomes of school-age children who underwent rigid bronchoscopy for suspected FBA and to propose a clinically applicable management algorithm. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective single-center study was conducted involving 58 patients over six years of age who underwent rigid bronchoscopy for suspected foreign body aspiration between January 2019 and December 2023. All patients underwent imaging evaluation, including low-dose computed tomography (CT) following the ALARA principle when clinically indicated.
resultsThe cohort included 51 males (87.9%) and 7 females (12.1%), with a mean age of 9.14 years (range: 6.17-13.83 years). The most common clinical manifestations were cough (94.8%) and wheezing (89.7%). Pen caps (43.1%) and watermelon seeds (17.2%) were the most frequently aspirated foreign bodies. Most patients (62.1%) presented within 24 h. Bronchoscopic removal was successful within 30 min in 56.9% of cases. Two patients (3.4%) required thoracotomy following unsuccessful bronchoscopic attempts.
conclusionFBA in school-age children demonstrates distinct clinical characteristics, with non-food foreign bodies such as pen caps being predominant. Low-dose CT plays an important diagnostic role, while rigid bronchoscopy remains the primary treatment for central airway foreign bodies, and flexible bronchoscopy is useful for distal airway involvement. A structured algorithmic approach may facilitate timely diagnosis and appropriate intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.